?
Offices across the UK have been spookily quiet the past few days. First there was the Easter holidays, followed swiftly by the extended Royal Wedding / May Day Bank Holiday weekend. Many workers deemed the three day week in between these two mega-weekends as insignificant, and by taking just three days vacation many could be out of the office for 11 days. So has the Royal Wedding hindered the productivity of the UK economy?
- Extra holidays are a royal nuisance. In the Financial Times, Alison Smith wrote about the staffing troubles some companies have faced through the extended holidays. “Even within a single sector, different practices prevail,” she explained. Tesco, for example, will give the day off with pay to staff contracted to work,?and?will?pay?top?rates to staff who agree to work on the day. But Marks and Spencer is simply altering opening hours, staying shut until 1 pm so that staff can spend the morning watching the occasion if they choose, and then come in for a normal afternoon of work. Smith mused that at least 2012’s?extra bank holiday – for the Queen’s diamond jubilee – comes in early June, two months after Easter. “Not only will this relieve pressure on the days in between but, after this year’s extravaganza, employers will be better at handling the issue.”
- The view from across the Atlantic. Even the LA Times picked up on the fact that it may not be wise for the UK to add an extra holiday, “at an estimated cost of nearly nearly $10 billion”, when climbing out of a recession. “All the hype about block parties, big champagne orders and wedding kitsch of unspeakable tackiness has obscured a dismaying fact: The royal nuptials are likely to be a drag on Britain’s economy, not a boost.” They’ll cost the public purse at a time of painful government austerity. And “That loss dwarfs whatever gains come from tourism and sales associated with the royal wedding.”
No comments:
Post a Comment